Nathan Smith, New Generation Voters
May 11, 2018
In the summer of 2015, the European Union, China, Russia, and the U.S. sat down to construct a deal that would prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. For years prior, Iran had been slowly trying to gather the materials necessary to make the bomb, while Israel and the rest of the world watched with concern. A nuclear Iran would threaten the stability of the region even more, as they continue to threaten Israel and compete with Saudi Arabia. Since Russia, China, the United States, the UK, and France had acquired nuclear weapons, it had been the goal to prevent other countries from getting the same capability. Unfortunately, India, Pakistan, Israel, and at this point North Korea all possess nuclear weapons. While North Korea is an entirely different issue, the world’s nuclear powers were determined to reach a deal that would at least hamper Iran’s ability. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), settled in 2015 by the Obama administration, lifted the economic sanctions from Iran, while Iran was forced to limit their uranium enrichment, and close a number of their centrifuge facilities.
Continue reading “Israel, Iran, and Syria: Is War Up Ahead?”
The enumerated objects over which the federal government was given its jurisdiction during the ratification debates in 1787-89 have been heavily disputed within the court system to this day, with such disagreements frequently appearing before the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court itself. The debate over the separation of the sovereignty of the states from the sovereignty of the national government itself still remains unresolved today (see Federalist No. 39). In Printz v. United States, specifically, the issue at hand involved whether the federal government could issue directives to state law enforcement officers in Montana and Arizona to uphold and enforce federal background checks as required under The Brady Handgun Prevention Act passed by Congress in 1993, which created a National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) in order to track the potential criminal histories of consumers wishing to purchase firearms. Upon a writ of certiorari, the Supreme Court agreed to review the issue in greater depth.
Continue reading “Printz v. United States (1997): Scalia, Madison and the Original Intent of Federalism’s Paradigm”
Our hearts go out to the families of the 17 victims who, just two weeks ago, were murdered in the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Florida. The shooter, nineteen-year-old Nikolas Cruz, had several guns in his possession, including an AR-15 which he used in the attack. Questions surrounding the shooting abound and many people are demanding to have stricter controls placed upon the purchase of firearms, with many desiring to ban assault weapons altogether. Continue reading “Gun Control is Not the Answer”
By Nathan Smith and Christopher Goodrich
The 2018 State of the Union address has undoubtedly summed up the presidency of Donald Trump. Not only was it the longest one in recent memory, it was probably the boldest and most memorable in recent memory; surely for decades.
Trump promised to deliver a unifying message. Whether it was for the rich or poor, black or white, citizen or non-citizen, he exulted some of America’s core values and principles in this address. Whether you are a supporter or a critic, there was something for you in this speech, and this worked undoubtedly in his favor.
Continue reading “NGV Friday: State of the Union – Where Do We Stand?”